Translators - Translator Resources
ProZ.com全球翻译服务目录
 The translation workplace

German德语: eng gesetzt

English英语 translation: restricted / restrictive / confined / narrow






KudoZ
The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators... More

词条(来自下列问题)
German德语词条或短语:eng gesetzt
English英语翻译:restricted / restrictive / confined / narrow
输入者:Deborah Shannon
选项:
- 对此条目发表意见

14:02 Jan 28, 2004Login or register (free) for more options.
German德语至English英语翻译 [专业]
Law/Patents - 国际组织/开发/合作 / South Africa, politics
German德语词条或短语: eng gesetzt
Der verfassungsmäßige Rahmen für den Landreformprozeß in Südafrika ist * eng gesetzt.* Gleichwohl hat sich die Regierung zu weitreichenden Reformen verpflichtet: (and then a series of reforms).

I'm not quite sure what point is being made about the constitutional framework here (especially as elsewhere in the text the new constitution is applauded).
Deborah Shannon
英国
Limited/restricted in scope
说明:
Rural Development Programme (RDP)

It is important to note that the RDP was completed after the *interim constitution was written* and put its plans for land reform *within the confines* of the provisions on land contained within the constitution. Not surprisingly, the RDP did not go far beyond listing a lot of good intentions and wishes. It did not address difficult issues of how to avoid or deal with the consequences of disrupting existing commercial agriculture or the resistance to fundamental change that was bound to come from landowners and from international business interests. The intentions set out in the RDP would, had they been decisively acted on, have gone someway to bringing about a fundamental transformation of property relations.

The few intimations in the RDP of anything outside a narrow free-market ideology, such as statements like “increasing the public sector in strategic areas through, for example, nationalisation,” were soon vanquished from future economic policies and statements. The clause already revealed an uncertainty as it *fell short* of saying that there would be widespread nationalisation as part of building a strong state capable of driving economic transformation. Nationalisation, became a “for example” and is quickly followed by talk of purchasing shares in companies and joint ventures with the private sector. Talk of democratising the economy and involving workers in decisions about the economy have in practice *never gone beyond rhetoric.*

The constitution of South Africa[14] was a result of and a key part of the negotiated settlement that ended Apartheid. Section 25 that deals with land rights was hotly debated. The resulting compromise set the political direction for the handling of land reform and set the legal parameters within which land reform has to be dealt with. The sentiment, expressed in the preamble, “that South Africa belongs to all who live in it,” finds no place in the property clause. The constitution recognises existing property rights in sections 25(1) and in section 25(2) allows for expropriation only “for a public purpose or in the public interest” and with compensation being paid.

These sections oblige the state to deal with aspects of land reform while also recognising current property rights. Thus *the constitution is a constraint* to the changing property relations in as far as it protects existing property rights, requires compensation to be paid for land to be used for land reform and does not establish clear rights to property for all South Africans or even for those who work the land. On the other hand the constitution does create an obligation on the state to have land reform and leaves space for far reaching reforms if the state is willing and able to make available sufficient finances and to implement a programme that can make the most of the land reform possibilities within the constraints.
获选答案来自:

Kim Metzger
墨西哥
提问者给回答者的留言
Very grateful for everybody's input
已将4分KudoZ分数奖给该答案



所提供的全部ENGLISH英语翻译如下:
4 +5is narrow
SwissTell
4 +3...is narrowly defined
gangels
4 +1narrow / restrictive
ntext
4 +1restricted
Andrew Read
4Limited/restricted in scope
Kim Metzger
4detailed
R. A. Stegemann


  

回答

3分钟   信心度: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5 同仁同意(净值): +5
is narrow


说明:
the constitutional framework ... is rather confined

SwissTell
美国
母语: German德语
此类别中专业问题的积分: 4

同仁对此翻译的评论(以及回答者的回复)
同意 ingo_h
5分钟

同意 Mag. Sabine Senn
9分钟

同意 Andrew Read: "rather narrow" sounds good; not "narrowly defined" in this context, IMO.
50分钟

同意 Brandis: could be also set narrow or narrowly set.
2小时

同意 kalimeh
3小时
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)


4分钟   信心度: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5 同仁同意(净值): +1
narrow / restrictive


说明:
meaning: does not allow for much leeway, does not leave much room for interpretation — something like that

ntext
美国
在该领域工作
母语: English英语, German德语
此类别中专业问题的积分: 12

同仁对此翻译的评论(以及回答者的回复)
同意 ingo_h
4分钟
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)


16分钟   信心度: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5
detailed


说明:
In the sense that there is little room for argument.

R. A. Stegemann
美国
在该领域工作
母语: English英语
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)


32分钟   信心度: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5 同仁同意(净值): +3
...is narrowly defined


说明:
xxx

gangels
美国
母语: English英语, German德语

同仁对此翻译的评论(以及回答者的回复)
同意 Robert Schlarb: yes, or " the constitutional limits are narrowly defined"
32分钟

同意 Trudy Peters
2小时

同意 Robert Kleemaier
6小时
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)


55分钟   信心度: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5 同仁同意(净值): +1
restricted


说明:
Another option:

The constitutional measures available are somewhat restricted:...

Andrew Read
英国
母语: English英语
此类别中专业问题的积分: 4

同仁对此翻译的评论(以及回答者的回复)
同意 Ingo Dierkschnieder: or limited
43分钟
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)


3小时   信心度: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5
Limited/restricted in scope


说明:
Rural Development Programme (RDP)

It is important to note that the RDP was completed after the *interim constitution was written* and put its plans for land reform *within the confines* of the provisions on land contained within the constitution. Not surprisingly, the RDP did not go far beyond listing a lot of good intentions and wishes. It did not address difficult issues of how to avoid or deal with the consequences of disrupting existing commercial agriculture or the resistance to fundamental change that was bound to come from landowners and from international business interests. The intentions set out in the RDP would, had they been decisively acted on, have gone someway to bringing about a fundamental transformation of property relations.

The few intimations in the RDP of anything outside a narrow free-market ideology, such as statements like “increasing the public sector in strategic areas through, for example, nationalisation,” were soon vanquished from future economic policies and statements. The clause already revealed an uncertainty as it *fell short* of saying that there would be widespread nationalisation as part of building a strong state capable of driving economic transformation. Nationalisation, became a “for example” and is quickly followed by talk of purchasing shares in companies and joint ventures with the private sector. Talk of democratising the economy and involving workers in decisions about the economy have in practice *never gone beyond rhetoric.*

The constitution of South Africa[14] was a result of and a key part of the negotiated settlement that ended Apartheid. Section 25 that deals with land rights was hotly debated. The resulting compromise set the political direction for the handling of land reform and set the legal parameters within which land reform has to be dealt with. The sentiment, expressed in the preamble, “that South Africa belongs to all who live in it,” finds no place in the property clause. The constitution recognises existing property rights in sections 25(1) and in section 25(2) allows for expropriation only “for a public purpose or in the public interest” and with compensation being paid.

These sections oblige the state to deal with aspects of land reform while also recognising current property rights. Thus *the constitution is a constraint* to the changing property relations in as far as it protects existing property rights, requires compensation to be paid for land to be used for land reform and does not establish clear rights to property for all South Africans or even for those who work the land. On the other hand the constitution does create an obligation on the state to have land reform and leaves space for far reaching reforms if the state is willing and able to make available sufficient finances and to implement a programme that can make the most of the land reform possibilities within the constraints.



    证明参考: http://www.nkuzi.org.za/land_reform.htm
Kim Metzger
墨西哥
母语: English英语
此类别中专业问题的积分: 8
提问者给回答者的留言
Very grateful for everybody's input
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)





返回KudoZ列表