| 话题中的页数: [1 2 3] > | is whereas becoming a transition? 论题张贴者: transparx
|
|---|
transparx 
美国
Local time: 19:46
English英语译成Italian意大利语
+ ...
I have noticed that some of my students (native speakers) use whereas in the following way:
1) Mary is rich. Whereas, John is poor.
In other words, they use whereas as if it were a transition (or transitional expression, or conjunctive adverb...).
As far as I know, whereas is a subordinating conjunction, used to express either concessive or contrastive relationships. Unlike most subordinating conjunctions, whereas is preceded by ... See more I have noticed that some of my students (native speakers) use whereas in the following way:
1) Mary is rich. Whereas, John is poor.
In other words, they use whereas as if it were a transition (or transitional expression, or conjunctive adverb...).
As far as I know, whereas is a subordinating conjunction, used to express either concessive or contrastive relationships. Unlike most subordinating conjunctions, whereas is preceded by a comma and should be used as illustrated in (2).
2) Mary is rich, whereas John is poor.
Question:
Do you think that sentence (1) reflects a change in progress, or is it just an example of informal writing? ▲ Collapse
| | | | | I've never encountered that ... | Mar 19, 2007 |
as far as I can remember (and I edit English writing by native speakers).
"Whereas" is a subordinate conjunction. Some coordinating conj. -- like "and," "but," and "so" -- can start sentences, but "whereas" isn't in that category.
The only exception I can think of is "legalese," where clauses of contracts or articles of constitutions start with "WHEREAS, blah, blah, blah" but that is technical writing, not prose for the general public.
I'll be interest... See more as far as I can remember (and I edit English writing by native speakers).
"Whereas" is a subordinate conjunction. Some coordinating conj. -- like "and," "but," and "so" -- can start sentences, but "whereas" isn't in that category.
The only exception I can think of is "legalese," where clauses of contracts or articles of constitutions start with "WHEREAS, blah, blah, blah" but that is technical writing, not prose for the general public.
I'll be interested to see what others say... ▲ Collapse
| | | | transparx
美国
Local time: 19:46
English英语译成Italian意大利语
+ ...
主题发起人
Patricia Rosas wrote:
The only exception I can think of is "legalese," where clauses of contracts or articles of constitutions start with "WHEREAS, blah, blah, blah" but that is technical writing, not prose for the general public.
thank you, Patricia!
I thought so, too. But this is definitely not legalese. I teach linguistics, and students are asked to answer several questions on a weekly basis.
The first time I saw whereas being used this way, I just assumed it was an error. However, given that some students who otherwise write fairly well have used it, I'm starting to think that there is something else going on.
| | | | | Informal writing, or just bad writing? | Mar 19, 2007 |
transparx wrote:
The first time I saw whereas being used this way, I just assumed it was an error. However, given that some students who otherwise write fairly well have used it, I'm starting to think that there is something else going on.
If there is, please nip it in the bud!
| | |
|
|
|
Hipyan Nopri
印度尼西亚
Local time: 06:46
English英语译成Indonesian印度尼西亚语
+ ...
| Subordinating Conjunction | Mar 19, 2007 |
Hi Trans,
I agree with you. In this case, it serves as a subordinating conjunction to compare or contrast two facts. Sentence 1) simply indicates a grammatical error.
Nevertheless, as has been said by Patricia, in legal, official documents 'whereas' may be used at the beginning of a sentence to mean 'because of the fact that . . .'.
| | | | transparx
美国
Local time: 19:46
English英语译成Italian意大利语
+ ...
主题发起人 | Hi Jane Translates, | Mar 19, 2007 |
JaneTranslates wrote:
Informal writing, or just bad writing?
If there is, please nip it in the bud!
I agree with you that such things shouldn't be encouraged. However, being a linguist, I just can't help but wonder...
By the way, I prefer to use informal writing as a euphemism.... I'm not here to judge, but to understand why native speakers (in all languages) resort to ungrammatical forms when there are grammatical alternatives available to them.
| | | | Angela Dickson (X)
英国
Local time: 00:46
French法语译成English英语
+ ...
| hi transparx | Mar 19, 2007 |
Two things:
1) if this were in a text that I was editing, I would change it (probably create one sentence where there had been two, as in your example).
2) You could well be right about the shift - though I would wonder about the written/spoken language divide here. Might these students simply be unaware of the punctuation rules for these conjunctions? In any case, what would be the ramifications of such a shift?
Despite the fact that this forum is called '... See more Two things:
1) if this were in a text that I was editing, I would change it (probably create one sentence where there had been two, as in your example).
2) You could well be right about the shift - though I would wonder about the written/spoken language divide here. Might these students simply be unaware of the punctuation rules for these conjunctions? In any case, what would be the ramifications of such a shift?
Despite the fact that this forum is called 'Linguistics' you are unlikely to find much descriptive wisdom here, I'm afraid... in our jobs we have to be prescriptivist, and that mentality is hard to shift. Most of your responses will be from people whose primary concern is 'good writing' which is probably not what you are most worried about... ▲ Collapse
| | | | Heinrich Pesch
芬兰
Local time: 02:46
正式会员 (自2003)
Finnish芬兰语译成German德语
+ ...
| descriptive vs. prescriptive grammar | Mar 19, 2007 |
The former should be applied to natives, the latter reserved for foreign students.
All languages and all grammer change all the time. If natives start to use some vocabularity in a new and creative way, it has to be accepted.
Though it makes me wince very often too, there is nothing to be done about it.
Cheers
Heinrich
| | |
|
|
|
No 2 is correct. No1 is not only in conflict with comparison but also with the full stop. The tendency to use shorter sentences for clarity is progressing yet only computed text can afford such drauma. You might want to give your students some work during classes to be handed in on leave.
| | | | Giles Watson
意大利
Local time: 01:46
Italian意大利语译成English英语
纪念 | English is not alone... | Mar 19, 2007 |
Those of you who can read Italian might find this link interesting:
http://www.corriere.it/Rubriche/Scioglilingua/2004/19marzo.shtml
For those who don't, the correspondence concerns the use in the Milan area, and increasingly elsewhere in Italy and in the media in particular, of the contrastive subordinating phrase "piuttosto che" (rather than) as... See more Those of you who can read Italian might find this link interesting:
http://www.corriere.it/Rubriche/Scioglilingua/2004/19marzo.shtml
For those who don't, the correspondence concerns the use in the Milan area, and increasingly elsewhere in Italy and in the media in particular, of the contrastive subordinating phrase "piuttosto che" (rather than) as a simple coordinator (or).
The Corriere della Sera's language expert regards this "fashion" as being "in bad taste" and "ambiguous" but also points out that the only way fastidious speakers of Italian can combat it is to eschew its use.
FWIW
Giles ▲ Collapse
| | | | Lia Fail (X)
西班牙
Local time: 01:46
Spanish西班牙语译成English英语
+ ...
| check in a corpus | Mar 19, 2007 |
transparx wrote:
I have noticed that some of my students (native speakers) use whereas in the following way:
1) Mary is rich. Whereas, John is poor.
In other words, they use whereas as if it were a transition (or transitional expression, or conjunctive adverb...).
As far as I know, whereas is a subordinating conjunction, used to express either concessive or contrastive relationships. Unlike most subordinating conjunctions, whereas is preceded by a comma and should be used as illustrated in (2).
2) Mary is rich, whereas John is poor.
Question:
Do you think that sentence (1) reflects a change in progress, or is it just an example of informal writing?
I'm not sure what you mean by "change in progress", but another approach to language (as an alternative to prescriptive grammar) is usage, and to check usage you can refer to a corpus.
I just had a quick look at WHEREAS in the British National Corpus of Spoken English, and there are very few sentences that begin with whereas and/or that are punctuated as you indicate.
http://132.208.224.131/scripts/cgi-bin/wwwassocwords.exe
| | | | | Punctuation, connotation, sense of euphony? | Mar 19, 2007 |
If this is a change in usage, doesn’t it stem less from a shift in the status of “whereas” than from a (let’s say) “unfamiliarity” with formal punctuation? And then the use of “informal punctuation” gives rise to a shift in the status of the word.
In other words, your examples 1 and 2 both say the same thing. Neither of them is hard to understand. It’s just that I have a little mental hiccup when I read sentence 1 and I don’t when I read sentence 2.
... See more If this is a change in usage, doesn’t it stem less from a shift in the status of “whereas” than from a (let’s say) “unfamiliarity” with formal punctuation? And then the use of “informal punctuation” gives rise to a shift in the status of the word.
In other words, your examples 1 and 2 both say the same thing. Neither of them is hard to understand. It’s just that I have a little mental hiccup when I read sentence 1 and I don’t when I read sentence 2.
On the other hand, and in broadly similar terms, increasingly I see the same sort of thing with “however”. One example – a few days ago I got a message from my ISP saying “We are trying to fix this problem, however we cannot give a timeframe …”.
The comma, followed by “however”, causes me the same mental hiccup. Lots of things are probably happening here, but a few considerations always strike me when I see “however” used like this.
One is the possibility that the writer is avoiding use of the word “but”. Perhaps the writer (without thinking too much about it) senses that “but” is too blunt a contrast, that “but” has vaguely negative connotations in a corporate communication.
The second is the possibility that the writer feels that “however” somehow sounds posher, more sophisticated than “but”.
The third is the possibility that the writer has some residual memory of a high-school English teacher insisting that you should never start a sentence with “but”.
Perhaps something like that is happening with your “whereas”. If it were replaced by “but’ in your example 1 (without the following comma), it would cause me no hiccups at all.
[Edited at 2007-03-19 13:49] ▲ Collapse
| | |
|
|
|
sarahjeanne (X)
巴西
Local time: 20:46
Portuguese葡萄牙语译成English英语
+ ...
| Editorial Skills vs Conversation | Mar 19, 2007 |
Transparx-
Are these high school students? College? Elementary? I find it hard to believe that this would be a new linguistic trend. My guess would be that these students perhaps haven't understood how to write a complete sentence (hence the fragment sentence). I find that many times when I am proofreading University level papers people tend to fall into a conversational mode and begin to write either run-on or fragment sentences. While this may be a result of a conversational l... See more Transparx-
Are these high school students? College? Elementary? I find it hard to believe that this would be a new linguistic trend. My guess would be that these students perhaps haven't understood how to write a complete sentence (hence the fragment sentence). I find that many times when I am proofreading University level papers people tend to fall into a conversational mode and begin to write either run-on or fragment sentences. While this may be a result of a conversational line of thought, I believe that when the professor sees this in a paper, it is evidence of a lack of editorial skills, and not of a new linguistic mechanism.
To sum up, I believe that in speech these students probably use whereas as a coordinating subjunction, but when they are writing they think of the pause used when speaking (normally expressed by the comma) and mistakenly use a period.
If you ask the students about why they do this I would be interested in hearing their answers.
Sarah ▲ Collapse
| | | | | For the purists - it is sacrilege! | Mar 20, 2007 |
I too have often seen the "however" and "whereas" used in the manner posted here and I am appalled. There are a few others which come readily to mind such as "thanks much" "is he/she there?" (this galls me - who is he/she? - particularly if you work in an organization with over 2,000 persons). Why not ask for the person by name? Or am I being a "fuddy duddy" here?
Not to mention in my part of the world, as far as the spoken word "violence" becomes "voilence", "character" becomes ... See more I too have often seen the "however" and "whereas" used in the manner posted here and I am appalled. There are a few others which come readily to mind such as "thanks much" "is he/she there?" (this galls me - who is he/she? - particularly if you work in an organization with over 2,000 persons). Why not ask for the person by name? Or am I being a "fuddy duddy" here?
Not to mention in my part of the world, as far as the spoken word "violence" becomes "voilence", "character" becomes "character" (with emphasis on the last syllable), "film" becomes "flim" and the list goes on and on. We won't even speak of the absence/addition of the letter "h" where "him" becomes " 'im" or instead of "I ate chicken today" it becomes "I het chicken today". Mark you, it is considered a language in itself (but it irks me). This is what the children hear and are being taught in schools. No wonder, the nation is in the state that it is!
Taña Dalglish ▲ Collapse
| | | | | Taña, if you're going to be a purist... | Mar 20, 2007 |
Taña Dalglish wrote:
No wonder, the nation is in the state that it is!
Taña Dalglish
You need to omit the comma from the above sentence!
On a more serious note, I would have thought "whereas" had a rather archaic flavour. I rather assumed it was on the way out. By the way, there is no reason for it not to begin a sentence; there seems nothing wrong with "Whereas John is poor, Mary is rich".
But returning to transparx's original example, I think this is just a question of bad punctuation. Recently, I attended a conference in which a thirty-year-old postgrad gave a talk. Listening to it, it seemed pretty OK, except he seemed to think "causal" was spelt "causual". However, I had a copy of his paper, and he had adopted the principle of "one clause per sentence". Which can be annoying. And it can impede comprehension. If it is not clear. Which clause is logically related to which other. If you see. What I mean.
| | | | | 话题中的页数: [1 2 3] > | To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator: You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request » is whereas becoming a transition? | Trados Business Manager Lite | Create customer quotes and invoices from within Trados Studio
Trados Business Manager Lite helps to simplify and speed up some of the daily tasks, such as invoicing and reporting, associated with running your freelance translation business.
More info » |
| | Protemos translation business management system | Create your account in minutes, and start working! 3-month trial for agencies, and free for freelancers!
The system lets you keep client/vendor database, with contacts and rates, manage projects and assign jobs to vendors, issue invoices, track payments, store and manage project files, generate business reports on turnover profit per client/manager etc.
More info » |
|
| | | | X Sign in to your ProZ.com account... | | | | | |
Login to reply/comment 
